It may be that imperialism is a self-destructive force—as oppression eventually turns the oppressed into oppressors. In this way the elephant is a symbol of oppression because the elephant is forcing the narrator to make a decision about where he has to stand on the issue of shooting in order to maintain a specific outward appearance. By creating contrasting characteristics, Orwell is able to further convey the self-destructive nature of imperialism. That is invariably the case in the East; a story always sounds clear enough at a distance, but the nearer you get to the scene of events the vaguer it becomes. He tries to figure out the state of affairs, but, as is common in his experience of Asia, he finds that the story makes less and less sense the more he learns about it.
On April 16, 2007, in the town of Blacksburg Virginia, a college student who attended Virginia Tech, opened gunfire to his fellow classmates. Many years later, the decision still haunted him. Here was I, the white man with his gun, standing in front of the unarmed native crowd — seemingly the leading actor of the piece; but in reality I was only an absurd puppet pushed to and fro by the will of those yellow faces behind. In the society Orwell lived in, hunting was common amongst gentlemen and is less challenged morally. Both essays have similar key ideas that identify Orwell as a writer. The elephant is still alive while Orwell shot him more and more but it seems to him that it has no effect on it. This is now the concept that most modern day families have adopted.
After seeing the dead labor, he sends orderly to bring him a gun that should be strong enough to kill an elephant. The most obvious is his choice to This split of his mind on both his government, and the people forced upon him by his government. The elephant that becomes a valuable subject through the story, naturally brings up the subject of its purpose—is the elephant a metaphor for something? Another noticeable pattern was his use of repetition, either ideas or specific phrases. Orwell killed the elephant for the safety of himself and out of pressure from the Burmese standing behind him Orwell 70. However… When Orwell stands before the crowd, he likens himself to a performer, rather than a peacekeeper or powerful official. A Moral Dilemma in Orwell's Shooting an Elephant Unanticipated choices one is forced to make can have long-lasting effects. The results of pride and power contribute to the themes that connect his essays and identify Orwell as a descriptive writer.
Alive, the elephant was worth at least a hundred pounds; dead, he would only be worth the value of his tusks, five pounds, possibly. Evidently, colonialism and the power dynamics it entails are too convoluted to be contained within a single straightforward point of view. He goes around the corner of her hut and sees a dead man lying belly down in the mud. The young Buddhist priests torment him the most. Orwell fells his strong hatred and tries not to be laughed at by the locals.
He found out what imperialism really is in its naked form, and the nature of it, from an incident in which he was practically pushed into shooting an elephant by the Burmese people. I was stuck between my hatred of the empire I served and my rage against the evil-spirited little beasts who tried to make my job impossible. And then down he came, his belly towards me, with a crash that seemed to shake the ground even where I lay. With this idea as his lens, he views the subjects of his central characters—the Burmese, the elephant, and the narrator—in opposite and contradictory personas. The story is an attempt to show the British population that it's time to move on from this old ideology.
Likewise, he has an internal clash between his moral conscious and his immoral actions. The stubbornness with which these Buddhist monks could tease him made him feel the most helpless. This is very significant when talking about the struggle of power within the text. Because the locals expect him to do the job, he does so against his better judgment. However, Orwell was caught in a bitter dilemma and while he was feeling unlucky at being a part of the British tyranny, on the other he could not help feeling bad about how the locals retaliated with disgust. He makes up his mind to simply watch the elephant to make sure it does not become aggressive again, and does not plan on harming it.
Readers are able to relate to the fact that he does not want to be humiliated in front of the Burmese. Pets that I have taken under my wing become my responsibility and my family no matter how small or big they are. The story depicts a young man who has to decide whether to bend to the rules of his superiors or to the majority, or to follow his own path. He becomes a sort of hollow, posing dummy, the conventionalized figure of a sahib. After a bit of time, the elephant sinks to its knees and begins to drool. It had killed a cow, and destroyed fruit stalls and stock and even vented its anger on the municipal van. The narrator has a sort of hatred for almost all the people that surround him.
Orwell realizes that throughout his entire rule in Burma he is actually the victim of the Burmese, and it is their expectations of what he should do with his power that force him to do what they want. After Orwell's death in 1950, the essay was republished several times, including in Shooting an Elephant and Other Essays 1950 , 1957 , and Selected Writings 1958. Entering one of the poorest. He detests his situation in life, and when he is faced with a moral dilemma, a valuable work animal has to die to save his pride. This is a critical mistake; the Burmese who are following him assume that, since he now has an elephant gun, Orwell has decided to kill the elephant.
He is later told that the elephant took a half hour to die. . The Europeans, colonizing and invading the land of the Burman Indians, were subject. We began questioning the people as to where the elephant had gone and, as usual, failed to get any definite information. The wretched prisoners huddling in the stinking cages of the lock-ups, the grey, cowed faces of the long-term convicts, the scarred buttocks of the men who had been flogged with bamboos — all these oppressed me with an intolerable sense of guilt. Also since he was seen as the figured head of the state he had to take action or ruin not only his own standings with the crowd but also with the face of the British Empire. While asking in the neighborhood for where they have last sighted the elephant, he suddenly hears yells from a little distance away and immediately follows it.