Sounds shady to me John. As for copy rights they should try to work with agents such as Interpol. In freedom of speech no! There are better ways to deal with piracy in cyberspace than with the heavy hand of censorship. Halting internet services, even for an hour can cause major inconveniences and can have dire consequences all over the world. Michael on Facebook: Wikipedia can't function because most of its content is in violation of copyright materials. I guess you can say lesson learned. Karl in Flint This is like illegal immigration.
Supporters claim that regulating content in the internet is an effective way to lessen if not totally deter illegal activities because it keeps people from promoting malicious content which can easily influence others, if no regulations are imposed. Its part of the world agenda to keep information off the internet, because they want total control over us, and control our ideas. What happened to the existing copyright laws and enforcement. No internet filter is perfect, and cannot possibly be perfectly calibrated to permit access to any such resources while filtering out others except on a tedious manual basis. Certain terms could not be Googled.
We should encourage the release of classified information that reveals government abuses, but ban lawmakers from becoming lobbyists once they leave office. Although the accessibility of internet voting is a viable model to increase higher voter turnout rates and reduce governmental cost, I believe internet voting should not be incorporated into democracy because it perpetuates a stronger bias in the results sustaining an economic classes where only citizens with the economic means to afford internet are…. Almost every one that does listen to it, enjoys music and sees it as a privilege. They just need to forget this law and put their thinking caps back on for a solution for the piracy issue. Additionally, most children who live in environments in which their parents lack access to Internet protection likely also lack the resources to acquire computer technology and Internet access. The United States is not the only country with this problem. Too often, clips of people are uploaded without their knowledge or consent.
Ron Paul has the answers, as did our Founders all those years ago. More crimes, more hate and violence, and more evil. They Do Bad Things Such As Steal, Curse, And Cause Harm To Their Parents Or Legal Guardians. The other effect will be that individuals who run websites within our country will be run over by the big guys. Sites like Youtube are frequently used to advertise, so why are they doing things like this to cut off part of their revenue? The United States Government needs to stop drafting laws that aim to reduce online privacy and give the government the power to effectively censor the internet. Thesis: The United States Government must cease trying to reduce privacy and censorship on the internet, because it limits the right freedom of speech, builds mistrust towards the government, and it wastes resources better spent on other types of law enforcement.
It will be the beginning of the end! Thus Dixon supports regulation of the Internet. I guarantee you Jack, the minute the government starts snooping its big nose into our Private business on the internet, evil is brewing. Maybe Al Gore can sit behind a desk and monitor the traffic and see who downloads a song for free. It Has Gotten So Bad That They Cant Even Put More People In Jails, And That They Have To build More. No, how is this any different BillK No , This measure is backed by the media and entertainment companies, as well as labor groups and manufacturing industries, including pharmaceutical companies seeking to stop counterfeit drug marketers. We've already faced censorship check out the banned books lists at your local public library to get an idea of just how nutty some politicians get once they decide they and only they know what is moral; the Catholic Church has a list of books that they forbid Catholics to read and seen the harm it does anyone remember Anthony Comstock and is crusades? He asked whether we should reclaim the word censorship, because of its negative connotations. The government wants to protect its secrets from web sites, such as Wikileaks.
For those that completely disagrees with censorship you would change your mind quickly and be very upset with the site if this happened to you. Lest we forget, in most of the developing world going to the movies is a cost prohibitive luxury. The same argument is used to not pass a law outlawing semi-automatic weapons and guns that can shoot down airplanes because of the fear of some that it will lead to no guns at all. Otherwise these groups are driven underground and become martyrs. As these are influential firms that shape the economy of not only the United States but the entire world, the availability of the internet is at the core of the global economy. To censor the Internet would take away from one's freedom of expression.
. How do they propose to control the Internet? Regulating and censoring online content would be in direct opposition of the Amendment. Just because we all back fighting online piracy doesn't mean we have to accept the end of free exchange of information online, all in the name of making Hollywood more money. Then ban all art, museums, farms, and whole cities too. She argues that the rule of law should be upheld. Should we allow terrorists and other scum to usethe Internet to pass on their agenda? The United States Government must cease trying to reduce privacy and censorship on the internet, because it limits the freedom of speech, builds mistrust towards the government, and it wastes resources better spent on other types of law enforcement. The media is a big part of life in the world.
A government leader, for example, can ban the release of videos and online content proving his or her illegal activities by imposing news blackout. Internet users no longer have to listen to the biased networks trying to fool and trick the masses. What if I told you that many artists around the world, including America, are being tormented and silenced for their freedom of expression? List of Cons of Internet Censorship 1. Social reasons The most obvious reasons why the internet gets censored is to protect the social fabric. The movie and software industry claims they are losing money because of this and tries to get the government to shut down websites that hurt their bottom line? The use of censorship by one side to gain power over another is apparent throughout history. The Internet doesn't start and end in a certain place. Without any form of censorship, it will be impossible to keep bad elements and terrorists from accessing information that will pose a threat to the security of the nation.